Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú

Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú BLOGS - Nick Robinson's Newslog
« Previous | Main | Next »

No snap

Nick Robinson | 15:15 UK time, Saturday, 6 October 2007

Rumour has it that the poll of marginal constituencies which has been carried out for tomorrow's News of the World by ICM shows a significant Tory lead. Surely they will have to confirm soon that there will be no snap election...

Comments

  • 1.
  • At on 06 Oct 2007,
  • Paul Haley wrote:

Hey Nick,

Who are all these voters who are so fickle as to change their opinion each week? Are we to really believe from the pollsters that about 20% of voters blow with the wind?

  • 2.
  • At on 06 Oct 2007,
  • Quentin Edgington wrote:

If that is the case it would be one of the most stunning political turnarounds by any Political Party.

Gordon Brown is going to find it very hard in the future as he is 'the face of Labour' when he offers 'grin and spin politics' which surpass even Tony Blair at his very worst!!!!

I think the Country has had more than enough of this 'New Labour' Government.

  • 3.
  • At on 06 Oct 2007,
  • R Joseph wrote:

Now you can go on holiday, Nick. Nuffin is going to happen. No election.

By the time Gordon calls one in 2010, Cameron will be no more and I am afraid Ming will be a trifle old.

  • 4.
  • At on 06 Oct 2007,
  • Jean Gatehouse wrote:

Re the 'Election Gas Balloon' which has been floating around the media... 4pm today, Saturday, the report was something like it is 'expected that'... Nick Robinson 'believes that' the Prime Minister will not hold a snap election. That is not news it is prediction - wait for the facts. Too much guessing - overlaid with alliteration and drama from NR- news should be fact not fiction!

  • 5.
  • At on 06 Oct 2007,
  • Terry wrote:


So there we have it, it would seem. As voters we've been treated with absolute contempt in order to try and score points off the Tories. So where is this New World we had been expecting? This fiasco need never have happened. There was absoultely no need to call an election early, and the whipping up - by Government advisers - of expectations was totally meaningless. Tony Blair actually looks good in comparison. David Cameron is doubtless breathing a sigh of relief, and it is incumbent on him to get the Shadow Cabinet's act together and present a viable alternative.

  • 6.
  • At on 06 Oct 2007,
  • Andy D wrote:

Gordo's just going to look weak, weak, weak after this....

  • 7.
  • At on 06 Oct 2007,
  • Max Sceptic wrote:

If he calls an election - he'll be thrashed. (Good riddance) If he doesn't call an election he'll be seen as a lame-duck coward. Oh what a pretty mess he's got himself into with his 'politcal cleverness'

  • 8.
  • At on 06 Oct 2007,
  • wrote:

Nick,

on News24 just now you've made rather a sweeping generalisation equating "strong government" with our current voting system and "weak government" with electoral reform. Historical examples from past UK elections as well as experience from other countries should lead you to a rather more nuanced analysis of this debate, even given the constraints of getting across such points on live TV.

  • 9.
  • At on 06 Oct 2007,
  • sandymac wrote:

Based on rumour, no one really needs to confirm anything. A good decision not to have an election though it was only the media and opposition parties calling for one.

  • 10.
  • At on 06 Oct 2007,
  • James Adams wrote:

So he's bottled it, what a suprise. So much for a conviction politician, there was more dithering than Steve McClaren when trying to pick an England team!!

I think Mr Brown has just started the beginning of the end for himslef and the Labour party. The country has been waiting for an alternative to Labour for too long; if one had existed in 2005 Labour would not be enjoying a third term. Now the country is at last seemingly presented with an alternative and he bottles it.

Why not let the country decide Mr Brown? You're poll ratings are only going to slip further by not calling an election.

  • 11.
  • At on 06 Oct 2007,
  • Clive B wrote:

I have this vivid image in my mind of that scene at the end of The Battle of Britain where the massed German troops lining the Channel throw their life jackets into a big pile and start the big march home ......

  • 12.
  • At on 06 Oct 2007,
  • Rhys Jaggar wrote:

Democracy has been served by this decision.

There is no constitutional requirement to go to the country and it is taxpayers' money which is wasted on frivolous campaigns.

Yes, much money is raised privately, but all the election machinery is paid for out of my taxes, your taxes, and Joe Public's taxes.

Stop these politicians playing with our money like it's theirs and get them to mortgage their own houses to pay for elections which are neither required nor appropriate.

Oh: and for all the papers feeding on election frenzy: make them pay 50% of their annual profits too.

That should shut 'em up for once in their lives....

  • 13.
  • At on 09 Oct 2007,
  • Michael M wrote:

I challenge you, Nick Robinson, to publish this comment that dares to critisize your incessently boring reports on the 'political immorality' of the PM's "non-announcement on whether to call a General Election or not call a General Election"! It is a non-story. It has no relevance to the lives of the UK public. It is only of use to Opposition parties and reporters who are determined to oust this Government, like yourself.

This post is closed to new comments.

Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú iD

Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú navigation

Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú © 2014 The Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.