Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú

Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú BLOGS - See Also
« Previous | Main | Next »

Reviews of Anish Kapoor's Olympic sculpture

Clare Spencer | 16:00 UK time, Thursday, 1 April 2010

OrbitCommentators and critics assess the London 2012 Olympic Games' monument - a spiralling sculpture designed by Turner Prize-winning artist Anish Kapoor.

the sculpture's biggest problem is its lack of meaning:

"The controversy it has attracted is not particularly surprising. Orbit is big, expensive and modern, all characteristics bound to unleash the most animated armchair histrionics.
Ìý
"But even worse, it's abstract art and regardless of what the cultural establishment would have us believe, many people find it difficult to relate to abstract art...
Ìý
"Is it beautiful? No. Is it ugly? Probably. But what this crude, subjective assessment doesn't assess is a far more important question: what does it say?
Ìý
"And this perhaps is Orbit's biggest flaw and the reason why it has attracted such negative publicity."

Architect that the structure will not enter the public consciousness because it's "too clever for its own good":

"It's got to have a simple easy-to-recognise cartoon-like image... This I have a bit of a problem with; to me, it looks like a bit of a jumble."

In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿ÚÌýWebwise for full instructions. If you're reading via RSS, you'll need to visit the blog to access this content.


Mr Kapoor's move away from his usual "emotional" approach:

"But there is, for me, an entirely new, sci-fi feel about the Orbit, owing to the UFO-like viewing platform at its summit. The coils then begin to look like traces of movement - contrails as much as entrails. I've always found Kapoor's monumental works - many, like the Orbit, realised in collaboration with Cecil Balmond - impressive as engineering feats but less absorbing than his smaller sculptures."

that Anish Kapoor is not the only one involved in the project:

"The Orbit Tower reflects a meeting of two of the boldest minds in British art. Anish Kapoor's ability to create conceptually astonishing works is proven. Cecil Balmond's role is less well known, but he is the genie whose geometrical alchemy has influenced projects as diverse as Kapoor's 2002 Marsyas installation in Tate Modern, Daniel Libeskind's V&A Spiral, and Toyo Ito's Serpentine Gallery Pavilion."

the structure could be a rare good news story, leading a change in the way the London Olympics is portrayed:

"So the London Olympics is to sport a largely privately funded artwork that is in danger of being both interesting, aesthetically pleasing, and fun. The announcement of the Anish Kapoor tower and the revelation that it will be largely paid for by the Indian steel magnate Lakshmi Mittal raises an alarming new question over the 2012 Olympics.
Ìý
"Is there a lurking danger that the Olympics are becoming - perish the thought - a good news story? The unveiling of Kapoor's intriguing tower coincides with the discovery that businesses across the UK - from a concrete company in Northern Ireland to a stationery company in the Northern England, and a Scottish company handling an aquatic sports contract - are all benefiting nation-wide from the £9bn expenditure of public moneys on the London games."

Links in full






More from this blog...

Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú iD

Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú navigation

Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú © 2014 The Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.