麻豆官网首页入口

bbc.co.uk Navigation

Rory Cellan-Jones

Meeting Google's Threesome

  • Rory Cellan-Jones
  • 19 May 08, 22:15 GMT

You arrive up a long drive, past golfers and other country club members. Then, after passing through the portals of this hotel on the outskirts of Watford, you are suddenly in a different world. Eager young people are networking furiously, the chief executives of Europe's leading media companies are having discreet chats in the corner - oooh and there go two of the richest people you're likely to meet, the billionaire founders of the world's most happening technology company.

Welcome to , an in-house corporate conference like no other. After all, which other company could attract a prime minister and a queen ( and ) as speakers?

For a group of journalists from across Europe - including me - it was also a rare opportunity to meet the threesome at the top of Google. For an hour, in a conference room at the hotel, the founders and and the chief executive, (he's also a billionaire from his stock options), answered our questions.

Google co-founder Larry Page and CEO Eric SchmidtWe didn't get the hot news that we were looking for - a speedy response to in the Yahoo saga - but we did get a fascinating glimpse of what makes Google work, and the dynamics of the relationship between three very smart, and very strong-willed people who continue to build an ever more powerful business.

Larry Page and Sergey Brin, in almost identical dark jackets and grey T-shirts, sat side by side, batting most of the questions around - while Eric Schmidt, like a proud uncle with two brilliant nephews, sat at the end of the table, occasionally intervening when he felt Larry or Sergey were being too exuberant in their responses.

The threesome came together seven years ago, when Page and Brin recruited Schmidt as their chief executive, and they still seem to function as a team. I'm struggling to think of another business where the founders have made that work so well - usually, the clash of egos between entrepreneurs and professional managers leads to an explosion and some hasty departures.

So what did we learn? That, like any team whose overwhelming success has begun to antagonise the rest of the world, they present a united front against any criticism. No, Google isn't too powerful in advertising - it's yet to make it big in television or radio or print (but we're coming so watch out was the underlying threat). Oh, and by the way, our success isn't down to the "strong-arm tactics" used by another company which has run into anti-trust problems. Hmmm, wonder who that could be?

What about privacy? Not a real problem for Google - it's those pesky social networking sites that are the real issue, with users putting inappropriate photos online. "These things pop up and haunt you," according to Sergey. Whereas we will only use search data to give you an even better, more personalised web experience. And while some businesses may choose to play fast and loose with your data, that isn't the case with Google: "If we're not trusted, we have no business. We have such a lot to lose."

When it comes to the opposition, these guys claim they actually spend very little time thinking about it. In the words of Eric Schmidt, "Google tries to think about Google most of the time." You might think the two founders, having built huge fortunes and the world's most admired technology business, would find it a little dull to continue thinking about Google, but both seemed fired up by new challenges.

For Larry Page it was renewable energy. He's spotted that the huge server farms Google is building have lower energy bills in those places where the electricity comes from dirty old coal-fired power stations. So his new challenge is to prove that you can make renewable energy cheaper than coal, with investments in solar power.

Sergey Brin, just back from visiting relatives in Russia and apparently proffering some technical support, is frustrated by how complicated computers still are for many users, and fascinated by the way mobile phones are likely to give many in the developing world their first access to the internet. He promises that , Google's mobile operating system, will make a big difference in places like Africa.

Both apparently feel the need to show that their huge wealth can be put to good use - as well as buying them their own private Boeing 767. Here's how Sergey Brin summed it up at the end of their press conference: "We have to prove to the world that, as we have been successful and fortunate, we can reinvest to create substantial good."

It was a relaxed and sure-footed performance by the triumvirate that runs Google. Their company is no longer the smart and plucky kid taking on the big boys, but, to some eyes, the new playground bully of the internet. But they have the satisfaction of knowing that while "Google tries to think about Google most of the time", that is just what the opposition are doing too.

Darren Waters

What is informed consent?

  • Darren Waters
  • 19 May 08, 17:00 GMT

When you sign up for a Facebook account, or an AOL account, or any one of a thousand different online services, do you ever read the terms and conditions?

I certainly don't. I just tick the necessary box and move on.

In so doing, I could be opening myself up to all sorts of things I don't really want, from targeted advertising to automated e-mail alerts, but I don't have any real come back because I've given my "informed consent".

But what does informed consent mean?

It's an important question because increasingly we are being asked to consent to the use of, and sharing of, our most personal data when online by companies who want to exploit it for commercial ends.

Should informed consent be contained within terms and conditions? How can we withdraw our informed consent if we change our minds?

An international working group has been created to help uncover solutions to the problem of how to create a "legally acceptable means of establishing consumer consent".

The group has been created following a ruling by EU privacy commissioners that informed consent must be obtained if companies wish to advertise to customers.

Members include Privacy International, the Information Commissioners of Ireland, France, the UK, Germay and Slovenia, as well as the involvement of firms like Microsoft, AOL and Facebook.

Privacy consultants will manage the working group.

The group hopes to produce a number of recommendations about how informed consent should be implemented by the end of the year.

With controversies around services like still ongoing, and new services being launched by the bucket-load each week, having a unified stance on consent is more urgent than ever.

It's not a sexy topic. But it's a crucial one.


Darren Waters

Thumb bashing at the Golden Joysticks

  • Darren Waters
  • 19 May 08, 14:46 GMT

It's that time of the year again: voting commences for the .

The Golden Joysticks pride themselves of being the "people's choice" when it comes to video game awards and last year 750,000 votes for the best of the best were cast.

The results do tend to be a little, ahem, populist - Gears of War was last year's big winner - but that's no bad thing, surely?

Copies of Grand Theft Auto IVWith the postponed until 2009 - to make the voting window simpler and end the farcical situation in which unfinished games were getting nominated - the Golden Joysticks have taken on more importance.

The organisers are hoping to break the million vote barrier this year and I'll bet now that Grand Theft Auto IV will be the big winner. You don't need a crystal ball to make that prediction.

Voting at this stage is to create a shortlist of titles, which will be revealed on 23 June.

.

The 麻豆官网首页入口 is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

麻豆官网首页入口.co.uk