This discussion has been closed.
Posted by M® Legs™ (U2373018) on Sunday, 26th August 2007
Don't you think it might be a good idea to have this up to date if it's being 'flagged up' as a feature to peruse?
No new kiddy in the Kate - Lucas section
George Barford - no death date
No Ben Archer - son of Ruth and David
No Meriel (sp) in the Kenton Archer segmant
No Ruairi
No Ian - Adam relationship
Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:39 GMT, in reply to fieldplace in message 2
The Adam -Ian thing is interesting. Genuine question..how are Civil Partnerships represented on family trees ?
There is no reason why civil partnerships shouldn't be represented in the same way as heterosexual marriages, with an = sign.
But now that illegitimacy has been effectively abolished legally and stable hetero partnerships with children are common how are they and their offspring represented?
On another thread, Keri mentioned that the Family Tree is being worked on.
The Interactive Map needs an update too. Adam & Ian still haven't moved into Honeysuckle.
Yep, the family tree is looking really good, is totally up to date and nearly ready. We'll probably be launching it with a few other goodies in September.
Welcome to the Archers Messageboard.
or  to take part in a discussion.
The message board is currently closed for posting.
This messageboard is now closed.
This messageboard is .
Find out more about this board's
Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú © 2014 The Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.