Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú

Notes and Queries  permalink

TA and legal advice

This discussion has been closed.

Messages: 1 - 4 of 4
  • Message 1. 

    Posted by DanskRose (U2257282) on Monday, 7th April 2008

    I have no legal background and have followed the Kathy SL with horrified fascination. I think Hedli's done a cracking job BTW with the SL. In the light of recent posts on loads of threads by lawyers, does anyone know if the following post (representative of many on the subject) is correct? If so, why is Kathy's case different? I confess to spitting nails that this action of Owen isn't getting to court.


    "What has annoyed me about the TA portrayal are the inaccurate aspects that would depress any possible victims when the writing has no relationship to reality. The top example recently has been not allowing the 'witness intimidation' facts to come out unless, oops, Kathy happens to mention it.
    Witness Intimidation is now a perfectly common charge added to the same trial where it is alleged. Even if it wasn't, it is utterly, utterly ludicrous to suggest - as logically must have happened here - that prosecution counsel and CPS lawyer have had a conference with the police/witness support and said 'hee hee, we can't mention it but tip the wink to the witness, then we'll get it in - by the way, would you mind recording this as evidence for when we're struck off?'. a. you would already have told the judge you're asking about this aspect b. in the (totally unrealistic) situation he'd disallowed it, you're stuck with it.
    This kind of sloppy writing does make the law seem like a game. It is fictitous. I'm all in favour of leeway for entertainment, but people trust R4 on important issues like this and have been let down."

    Report message1

  • Message 2

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by Pendolly (U10227039) on Monday, 7th April 2008

    Yes, it would be good to have an explanation if possible.

    Report message2

  • Message 3

    , in reply to message 2.

    Posted by Keri Davies (U2219620) on Wednesday, 9th April 2008

    We have been advised by two barristers and this came from one of them.

  • Message 4

    , in reply to message 3.

    Posted by DanskRose (U2257282) on Wednesday, 9th April 2008

    For which piece of info we nitpicking Archers lovers thank you kindly.

    Report message4

Back to top

About this Board

Welcome to the Archers Messageboard.

or  to take part in a discussion.


The message board is currently closed for posting.

This messageboard is now closed.

This messageboard is .

Find out more about this board's

Search this Board

Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú iD

Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú navigation

Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú © 2014 The Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.