This discussion has been closed.
Posted by shulascat (U14737252) on Friday, 22nd April 2011
On the Archers Who's Who, nobody is currently listed as playing either Lily or Freddie. Can I hope that Lily is to be replaced by a child who actually sounds like an intelligent 11-year-old?
They don't usually put child actors' names in the cast list until they graduate to coming in to the studio to record their scenes.
, in reply to message 1.
Posted by Tayler Cresswell - Host (U14232848) on Sunday, 1st May 2011
On the Archers Who's Who, nobody is currently listed as playing either Lily or Freddie Â
Hi shulascat
Younger cast members aren't listed in Who's Who for privacy reasons.
Tayler
‘Hi shulascat
Younger cast members aren't listed in Who's Who for privacy reasons.
°Õ²¹²â±ô±ð°ù’
Oh dear, Oh dear, Oh dear. Someone is pulling the wool over your eyes, Tayler. Please do not keep believing what your colleagues tell you and apply your own logic. The actor and actress are:
Freddie is Jack Firth and Lily is Georgie Feller
Their names are cited in a number of newspaper articles and I sincerely hope it was not Mr Davies who advised you on this as he names them in this Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú article:
Of all of the possible reasons for them not appearing in Who’s Who, privacy is not one.
And the Archers audience is around one million, not five.
Yes, the response seems a bit rich when the actors playing George and Josh are currently listed! I'd just wondered (hoped) that new actors were being found for the Frillies (well, Lily anyway). They certainly LOOK the part but, strangely, this is not terribly relevant to listeners.
, in reply to message 5.
Posted by Tayler Cresswell - Host (U14232848) on Monday, 2nd May 2011
Hi again shulascat
There are no biogs for the actors who play George or Josh, just their names and photos. I asked why there were no biogs for Freddie and Lily.
As far as I know, there are no plans to replace the actors who play Freddie and Lily
Tayler
But you were ASKED if an intelligent 11 year old actor was to play Lily! Not if there was a biography!
But you were ASKED if an intelligent 11 year old actor was to play Lily! Not if there was a biography!Â
What an unpleasant post.
What is unpleasant about pointing out she had not answered the question the poster asked?
It was unpleasant because you suggested that Lily's actor was unintelligent, rather than she was incapable of portraying an intelligent child; i.e. you replaced a comment on the actor's acting skill with a personal remark about the actor's level of intelligence.
I also think Seveek's comment to Tayler above was rude and uncalled for:
The identity of the child actors and why the names of child actors do not appear in Radio Times or on the website has been discussed many times on here over the years. Keri always said one of the issues was privacy, and (since he is/was responsible for the contents of the website) we can presumably assume he knows what he is talking about and was giving a genuine answer. What reason could there be for misleading us on this point?
Please, please can we treat board hosts, actors and production team members with civility and respect?
, in reply to message 9.
Posted by Tayler Cresswell - Host (U14232848) on Tuesday, 3rd May 2011
Hi all
I guess this question is terribly subjective:
Can I hope that Lily is to be replaced by a child who actually sounds like an intelligent 11-year-old?Â
I can answer that there aren't any plans to replace the actor who plays Lily.
Tayler
you suggested that Lily's actor was unintelligent*
No, it was NOT me, it was the first person who started the thread - Message Number one!
"Can I hope that Lily is to be replaced by a child who actually sounds like an intelligent 11-year-old?"
I just pointed out, this question was sidestepped, and ANOTHER ANSWER was given to an unasked question.
I think you are reading something into the first post that isn't there! Surely it was the acting ability that was in question, not the intelligence in the OP?
Incidentally, the actors for both Freddie and Lily sound fine to me.
They sound fine to me as well.
The quote is the question asked by the thread poster - there IS no other question.
Tayler chose to give an answer to an unasked question. She put in post 3 "Younger cast members aren't listed in Who's Who for privacy reasons. "
Which is not an answer to the only question asked, by shula'scat "Can I hope that Lily is to be replaced by a child who actually sounds like an intelligent 11-year-old?"
Tayler has since answered this question in Message 13.
After it was pointed out that she hadn't answered the original question.
I was NOT being unpleasant.
Just pointing out FACTS.
That's all!!!!
They sound fine to me as well.
The quote is the question asked by the thread poster - there IS no other question.Â
But there is a reference to the fact that there are no actor details in Who's Who.
Tayler has since answered this question in Message 13.Â
Tayler actually answered this in message 6: "As far as I know, there are no plans to replace the actors who play Freddie and Lily".
There was not a question about Freddie.
There was not a question about Freddie.Â
Priceless!
‘I also think Seveek's comment to Tayler above was rude and uncalled for’
I did not mean it to be rude, Mike. I just feel sorry for Tayler when she has to respond to us with something which is not logical or untrue. My expression of Oh Dear was in sympathy with her plight.
It is difficult to reconcile Mr Davies’s reluctance to put information on this board which is readily available from other sources a click away.
More so when one considers the posting ‘Nigel Pargetter - share your memories’, written by Keri Davies, and showing a picture of the twins with their names shown if one hovers over the photograph.
And the names of other child actors do appear on the Who’ Who; George Grundy, Ben Archer, Daniel Hebden Lloyd, Jamie Perks and Pip Archer are there but not the twins.
I hope that you see my point; no details on the profiles because of privacy but posted elsewhere in ML at will. It is not a logical standpoint.
I have a lot of respect for Tayler, particularly considering the difficult job she has.
‘What reason could there be for misleading us on this point?’
It is a mystery why anyone supported the privacy theory as being the reason Mike.
But now that they realise how inconsistent the approach was, Freddie and Lily are named and pictured.
Or perhaps they have just reached the age where they now come in to the studio?
Welcome to the Archers Messageboard.
or  to take part in a discussion.
The message board is currently closed for posting.
This messageboard is now closed.
This messageboard is .
Find out more about this board's
Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú © 2014 The Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.