Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú

Notes and Queries  permalink

Ronnie Daz and Christyfur

• Message 1. 

  Posted by A Frend (U2249422) on Tuesday, 2nd August 2011

  Boresetshire must be knee deep in horses and in horsey businesses. Selling the farriering only to one of two people doesn't strike me as the best deal from Ronnie's persepctive.
  
  I don't know a lot about selling a going concern but what I do know seems to indicate that:
  
  it'd be normal to sell it on the open market thus maximising your gains
  
  it wouldn't be normal to limit its sale by offering it only to two former employees
  
  Does anyone have an idea as to why Ronnie would be written as thinking that this is bizarre Apprentice-meets-the-X-factor arrangement is the best way of finding a buyer for a busy business?
  
  And if Lils swans in and pays the money down I shall be most disappointed.

  Link to this forum: Ronnie Daz and Christyfur

  Report message1

• Message 2

  , in reply to message 1.

  Posted by RS Acre (U6057963) on Wednesday, 3rd August 2011

  << Does anyone have an idea as to why Ronnie would be written as thinking that this is bizarre Apprentice-meets-the-X-factor arrangement is the best way of finding a buyer for a busy business? >>
  
  
  Snork, frenders!
  It is a figment of the prod team's imagination. With gaping holes you could drive a recently-shod carriage + 4 through.
  But this is Ambridge business ... when has reality ever intruded?

  Link to this forum: Ronnie Daz and Christyfur

  Report message2

• Message 3

  , in reply to message 2.

  Posted by A Frend (U2249422) on Wednesday, 3rd August 2011

  Thanks, Arsy. It seems weird to me: demanding that your two potential buyers meet a series of very specific requirements so as to screw the most out the thing you are selling but not thinking that it might be quite intelligent to extend the offer of sale county-wide, thus getting even more wonga.
  
  I wonder if Tayler has an idea of what the SWs mean ny the dim SL?
  
  It's clear however that ruddy lils who's about to be touched by James for even more cash - that development must be up the spout by now - will open her bountiful purse and buy the business for Chris. This'll make Amside's portfolio a bit odd, comprising buy-to-let houses, the Cattle Market Development and a Farriers. I wonder what her business plan says and what her mission statement is - "delivering cow and property solutions" or some such garbage.
  
  

  Link to this forum: Ronnie Daz and Christyfur

  Report message3

• Message 4

  , in reply to message 3.

  Posted by RS Acre (U6057963) on Wednesday, 3rd August 2011

  << "delivering cow and property solutions" >>
  
  Excellent, frenders. La Bapper is SO sacked ...
  
  
  RSy

  Link to this forum: Ronnie Daz and Christyfur

  Report message4

• Message 5

  , in reply to message 2.

  Posted by carrick-bend (U2288869) on Friday, 12th August 2011

  I quite agree with RSy -
  you might like to look at this thread -
  There are several posts from people who have RL experience of farriers, and their experience seems rather at odds with the "reality" purveyed by the SWs.
  
  

  Link to this forum: Ronnie Daz and Christyfur

  Report message5

• Message 6

  , in reply to message 5.

  Posted by RS Acre (U6057963) on Monday, 15th August 2011

  What ho, Carrick
  
  I don't think we are going to get any satisfactory answers from the prod team on this one. Even mAdam is convinced that a £200k outlay is going to be the making of Chris's business ... so it must be correct, & I must be wrong.
  
  
  Yours peevedly
  RSy

  Link to this forum: Ronnie Daz and Christyfur

  Report message6

• Message 7

  , in reply to message 6.

  Posted by carrick-bend (U2288869) on Monday, 15th August 2011

  My farrier said it was "implausible", and he's established enough to have "fancied Shula when she was virginal".

  Link to this forum: Ronnie Daz and Christyfur

  Report message7

Back to top