This discussion has been closed.
Posted by Our_Freda (U4239986) on Saturday, 24th September 2011
hope that's not outside the remit of this board.
I remember during the Madelaine McCann case, some posters opined that various people were to blame for Madelaine's disappearance/demise.
At that time, posts were removed and stern tickings off were given, with the reasoning that the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú, by publishing this material might be held in contempt of court, or sued for libel, or some such.
Can I ask, if the assertions in the comments section of the blog, (Autumn Hunting) that members of the MFHA habitually and intentionally set out to break the law, and that they and others who ride to hounds are unarguably also more likely to be child abusers is not somewhat similar?
I have no doubt the MFHA's legal advisors will take action in due course, but in the meantime, ought the posters not to be chastised and the comments removed?
You are normally quite lucid, Freda, but, having now read your post and Keri’s post a number of times, I am unable to understand your point.
Ha ha ha ha ha. What sort of "chastisement" are you thinking of OF? [I think you may have been watching too many adult films.]
I can't help wondering if someone who advocates "chastising" people who write posts on this MB must be in need of help. Prestatyn's callling!
Seveek thank you , and I was referring to comments, rather than the original post.
cath, hard as you may find this to believe I was not talking about you at all, I seldom read anything you say.
Me too OF, I always try to avoid you, but you know how the eye is drawn to ridiculous assertions when you're skim reading.
, in reply to message 2.
Posted by Reggie Trentham (U2746099) on Saturday, 24th September 2011
I've read Keri's blog and the subsequent comments and I haven't got a clue what Freda's on about either.
OF, there's a green 'complain about this post' button under each comment on the blogs, so anything libellous there can be brought to the mods attention.
, in reply to message 1.
Posted by Tayler Cresswell - Host (U14232848) on Sunday, 25th September 2011
Can I ask, if the assertions in the comments section of the blog, (Autumn Hunting) that members of the MFHA habitually and intentionally set out to break the law, and that they and others who ride to hounds are unarguably also more likely to be child abusers is not somewhat similar?Â
Hi Our_Freda
I can't see any comments that specifically accuse members of the MFHA of breaking the law. If you see a comment you think breaks the house rules, then please use the Alert link and let the moderators know.
Thanks,
Tayler
Thank you for your reply Tayler.
Welcome to the Archers Messageboard.
or  to take part in a discussion.
The message board is currently closed for posting.
This messageboard is now closed.
This messageboard is .
Find out more about this board's
Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú © 2014 The Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.