Pic of the Day: BeebCamp 3
Post categories: innovation
| 13:21 UK time, Friday, 27 November 2009
I managed to sneak out to catch a few sessions at , an event organised to bring together Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú people from different areas to work together for the day. I'm normally a bit of a cynic when it comes to organised attempts at creativity but I'm happy to admit that in this instance I'm very wrong. The two sessions I attended, the first on social media and news stories and the second on story-telling online, were quite inspiring and served to remind me that there are a lot of very very smart people around the place.
I'll pull together any blogs, reports and pictures on today's sessions in a round up next week. In the meantime read about and the first (and follow - NR).
Paul Murphy is the Editor of the Internet blog.
Comment number 1.
At 27th Nov 2009, TV Licence fee payer against Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú censorship wrote:"Director General for a day - What would you do?"
Paul, do you really want us to answer that?!...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 29th Nov 2009, Ed Lyons wrote:Should the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú make more data publicly available? Yes. You've got lots of data internally that may as well be available externally. Making it public wouldn't cost much and would allow others to know more about how the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú works. The government are making some sort of push towards having data publicly available (copying the american data.gov site), and the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú has quite a lot of good data already available, but there's much more that could be. Data should be public by default, and private only if there were good reasons for it not to be.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 27th Mar 2010, U14390976 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 12th May 2010, U14460911 wrote:All this user's posts have been removed.Why?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)