Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú

Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú BLOGS - Graham Smith's Blog
« Previous | Main | Next »

Dormouse scuppers Morrisons plan for Wadebridge

Graham Smith | 12:34 UK time, Saturday, 7 August 2010

dormouseAbsence of evidence is not evidence of absence. This is the important principle which looks as if it's going to become a crucial factor in the "battle of the supermarkets" currently raging in Wadebridge, where Sainsbury's and Morrisons are racing to develop new sites to the north of the town and Tesco is seeking expansion to the south.

Morrisons wants to build on the existing Wadebridge Football Club ground. Part of the deal is a new football site outside and to the west of the town at Bodieve. The proposed new football site is due to come before planners on Thursday and is a "make-or-break" element of the supermarket project: no new football club, no Morrisons.

The 10.5-acre site at Bodieve is currently agricultural and - possibly - home to a handful of dormice. Dormice are now so rare that they are on the list of European Protected Species and it is against the law to disturb their habitat. No-one has seen any dormice on the site but that doesn't matter - they have been seen just over a mile away and so there is a risk that they might take offence at the construction of six football pitches, floodlighting, changing facilities and 70 car parking spaces.

And so, notwithstanding what planning officer Gavin Smith sees as the community benefit of a new sporting facility, which is supported by both Sport England and the Football Association, he is recommending a refusal of permission:

"In the absence of the opportunity for the planning authority to consider the impact on a protected species as a material consideration, I am of the opinion that permission
cannot be granted to this application."

Supporters of the proposed new football site are now desperately hoping that a dormouse survey, due to be completed by November, will prove that no dormouse will be harmed by the project.

Meanwhile planners are soon to consider the Sainsbury's application, just yards from the existing Wadebridge Football Club (where Morrisons wants to go), at Higher Trenant. The proposed Sainsbury's site is on land owned by Cornwall Council.

Those councillors who are keen to sell to Sainsbury's, and cash in on a surplus asset in order to benefit Cornwall's council taxpayers, might now discover a new interest in nature conservation in general and the protection of dormice in particular.

Comments

  • Comment number 1.

    Wouldn't it be nice if the people of Wadebridge were asked what they want? Not the planners in London, Bristol or Truro. Not the various unelected quangos; not the doormice protectors; just ask the people of Wadebridge.

  • Comment number 2.

    The people of Wadebridge WERE asked what they wanted through proper public consultations. Everyone who wanted to comment on the projects was able to do so, and indeed the plans were amended accordingly, namely the cafe being removed from the initial plan in both Morrisons and Sainsburys cases, and the retention of the council offices in Sainsburys case

  • Comment number 3.


    As a matter of interest, the Dormouse picture is one of mine. A credit would be nice.
    John Robinson

  • Comment number 4.

    This Dormouse picture is from Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú stock, dated 2001. I am always happy to credit the photographer where this is known and can confirm that this picture was taken by John Robinson/English Nature. My apologies to John.

Ìý

Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú iD

Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú navigation

Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú © 2014 The Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.