Ant Miller| 12:00 UK time, Friday, 22 January 2010
Here's the second part of the Displays & Screens discussion with Quentin Cooper and Richard Salmon.Ìý In this second part they explore the recent advances in 3D television and what the current technical trials are.Ìý This may be of interest to those of you who were wondering if and when the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú may be trialling 3D- as this film makes clear the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú is well up to speed on developments, but we remain cautious about its suitability for domestic use.
In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú Webwise for full instructions. If you're reading via RSS, you'll need to visit the blog to access this content.
Note quite sure how this discussion "makes clear the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú is well up to speed on developments".
It explains 3DTV in general no more than countess resources on the web already do, and says nothing about what the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú itself is actually doing. Is the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú trialing 3DTV? Has it tried producing any 3DTV material, or trialing their broadcast?
This discussion tells me nothing about the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú's plans. If anything, it comes across like the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú is far less keen on 3DTV than other broadcasters and consequently doing nothing about it...
The point we're trying to make is that there's pretty much nothing going on with 3Dtv for the home at the moment that the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú R&D department hasn't investigated in depth. We've trialed anaglyph tech several times over the last few decades, and the other technologies available have been tested from a production and display point of view, but there are no active 3D broadcast trials.
We're not setting out the stand for the strategy of the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú in this area, and I'm sorry if we've given the impression that you'd find that here. This is the R&D blog, and R&D explores technolgy, finds the potential, and the challenges there, but the overall strategy is made in a broader context, incorporating our technical input but also taking into account all the public value tests that thhe Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú charter requires.
What about auto-stereoscopic (glasses-free) displays? What about multi-view (eg. 9 view) 3D? What about eye tracking 3D displays that change the 3D viewpoint? What about real 3D ie. not just a seperate left and right eye image but real 3d TV in real 3d space? What is the EBU doing with 3D? Will the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú iPlayer be updated to support 3D as well as updated to support interlaced content or higher frame rates and resolutions? Will the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú be working towards 1080p50 per eye 3D or will 3D force a halving of resolution or frame rate? Will 3D TV broadcasts mean an extra around 50% or 40-70% or more bitrate depending on content? Will the viewer be able to control the 3D viewing position?
This is the Research & Development blog, where researchers, scientists and engineers from Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú R&D share their work in developing the media technologies of the future.
For a detailed breakdown of our activities, teams, locations and how we collaborate visit our main website.
We also host videos on the main website without UK only distribution restrictions.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.
Comment number 1.
At 24th Jan 2010, citizenloz wrote:Note quite sure how this discussion "makes clear the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú is well up to speed on developments".
It explains 3DTV in general no more than countess resources on the web already do, and says nothing about what the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú itself is actually doing. Is the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú trialing 3DTV? Has it tried producing any 3DTV material, or trialing their broadcast?
This discussion tells me nothing about the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú's plans. If anything, it comes across like the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú is far less keen on 3DTV than other broadcasters and consequently doing nothing about it...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 24th Jan 2010, Ant Miller wrote:Hi citizenloz,
The point we're trying to make is that there's pretty much nothing going on with 3Dtv for the home at the moment that the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú R&D department hasn't investigated in depth. We've trialed anaglyph tech several times over the last few decades, and the other technologies available have been tested from a production and display point of view, but there are no active 3D broadcast trials.
We're not setting out the stand for the strategy of the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú in this area, and I'm sorry if we've given the impression that you'd find that here. This is the R&D blog, and R&D explores technolgy, finds the potential, and the challenges there, but the overall strategy is made in a broader context, incorporating our technical input but also taking into account all the public value tests that thhe Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú charter requires.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 27th Jan 2010, HD wrote:What about auto-stereoscopic (glasses-free) displays? What about multi-view (eg. 9 view) 3D? What about eye tracking 3D displays that change the 3D viewpoint? What about real 3D ie. not just a seperate left and right eye image but real 3d TV in real 3d space? What is the EBU doing with 3D? Will the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú iPlayer be updated to support 3D as well as updated to support interlaced content or higher frame rates and resolutions? Will the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú be working towards 1080p50 per eye 3D or will 3D force a halving of resolution or frame rate? Will 3D TV broadcasts mean an extra around 50% or 40-70% or more bitrate depending on content? Will the viewer be able to control the 3D viewing position?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)