麻豆官网首页入口

Rewriting Digital Britain

• Rory Cellan-Jones
• 2 Mar 09, 16:40 GMT

The - or rather - came out in late January and it is fair to say that the reactions were not exactly ecstatic. Some bloggers saw the report as unambitious - setting a target of just "up to 2Mbps" for universal access broadband, and failing to promise large sums of money to build a next generation network. Others were concerned that too much had been conceded to the copyright lobby in a report which should have said more about giving consumers free access to more content - and to the governement's own data. And just about everyone thought the whole thing was both too vague and too full of dodgy jargon.

To be fair to Lord Carter, he's been stressing the interim nature of his report - and making clear that the final version will have a lot more answers, as well as taking onboard suggestions from the consultation.

But two technology-minded academics may have done him a favour with a couple of ideas to make that consultation work better. First, Tony Hirst and Joss Winn created an version of the Digital Britain report, a place where anyone could come and give their take on every paragraph of the report. So far, the most "commented" section is the chapter on the economics of digital content. One typical contribution: "There is no justification - economic or otherwise - for the taxpayer to foot the bill for enforcement of the entertainment industry's IP rights."

But now Hirst and Winn have gone further. Having seen that there is plenty of criticism but not much coherent thinking about what a better "Digital Britain" report might look like, they have created . This is a wiki, which can be edited by anyone, with the aim of producing something similar to Lord Carter's effort by the time the consultation period ends on March 12th.

There is a lot of work to be done - so far little of the report has been filled in, and what is there is rather predictably utopian. The section on next generation networks says:

"We propose that a huge infrastructure programme is unleashed guaranteeing ultra-high-speed access to literally every home and business in the country. So that's fibre to the home for everyone. No quibbles, no "but it's too expensive", no messing around assessing demand from end-users. Just do it."

Yes, well I'm sure ministers will read that with interest and proceed to approve a 拢27bn programme of investment in fibre-to-the home. Possibly.

But Tony Hirst and Joss Winn aren't putting forward any particular views of their own - just doing their best to enable everyone else to have their say on some of the most important issues for our technology future. Joss explained that it was more about showing how it was possible to use very simple web tools to draw the public in to the discussion: "We're showing the government that myself and Tony - on zero budget -can make something much more accessible than they've done themselves. The tools are entirely available to government but they're just not using them."

In fact, the government has now started its own , which is taking some of the comments from Hirst and Winn's Write To Reply site. The final report will have little chance of pleasing everyone - but it may still end up as a good example of digital democracy, thanks to the efforts of two imaginative people.