| 11:47 UK time, Monday, 6 November 2006
On this week's Newswatch, the programme which discusses viewers' complaints about Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú News, Newsnight editor Peter Barron debates David Loyn's interview with the Taleban, and there's a report about the use of . You can watch it here.
Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú © 2014 The Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.
Comments
The media has a incredibly detached attitude these days that implies it can safely operate outside of the rules applicable to everyone else.
Is it clear in its own mind whether it is seeking to inform its listeners/viewers or to increase its ratings? Did it even contemplate that going into discussion behind enemy lines with the people in mortal combat with our young men would be treasonous?
Did it ask our armed forces for their views about the proposed discussions, and what questions they would like to ask the enemy?
I suspect that would have been more dangerous than going behind enemy lines!
First, don't label anyone an enemy as you are jounalists and not soldiers or policiticans. Secondly, don't question reporting the other sides point of view as dialogue will somehow reduce the violence.
Lastly, don't make it a big deal to go behind enemy lines as most so-called enemies don't hate you per se but hate the government you pay taxes. Believe it or not there are many educated 'enemies' and they can distinguish you from their 'oppressors' or 'invaders'. Trust that. Anything less is weak reporting. Continue the insertion reports and take a stand against obvious incidents instead of being a robot journalist.