Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú

Hmmm. Why are "The Editors" being so quiet on this subject? Why is there no comments box on the entry entitled Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú in the News, Thursday?

So much for accountability.

911 TRUTH NOW!

We will never EVER forget how the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú failed us.

We have had "cash for questions" for which the Tories were I seem to recall, guilty we have now had "cash for honours" where Labour were proved innocent. Finally, we have "cash (or rather no cash) for answers given by viewers of the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú" - the last seems to me to be fraud or is that not the case. If it is will the CPS be investigating and will the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú actually report on the matter? However, of far far greater significane is way in which the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú report news. There is always a biased spin. Today for example - surely the lead headline should have been " Tories beaten into 3 rd place in two mid term elections". No - that was not the headline. Bias or what? It is NOT editorial mistakes that should be addressed it is biased reporting and pure deceit that needs to be addressed.

Are we now no longer allowed to comment on stories?

I find it hard to believe that no postings have been made about the fake phone-in scandal.

Or have all the editors been suspended, so cannot write one of their fascinating blogs about the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú's culture of deceit?

Does this new promise of impartiality, honesty and probity mean that we might start getting some balanced reporting on the subject of Climate Change instead of the continual diet of unquestioned (though widely disputed) science.

I expect not.

Inevitably! But by whom? The same people who have failed so lamentably.