Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú

Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú Television programmesÌý permalink

Banished

Messages: 1 - 50 of 78
  • Message 1.Ìý

    Posted by Rosemary (U7231409) on Friday, 13th February 2015

    I wondered when this was going to turn up. Towards the end of this month, beginning of next, according to the Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú.



    I sometimes have a little trouble with some aspects of Jimmy McGovern's writing, but the subject-matter of this is intriguing, and not something I recall having dealt with much by TV drama. I'll be interested to see what it's like.

    Report message1

  • Message 2

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by goodhelenstar (U13943062) on Friday, 13th February 2015

    I'll certainly give it a go. It's a good cast including David Wenham (from Top of the Lake) who is the governor, so one of the bad guys presumably. MyAnna Buring was very good in Ripper Street, and Russell Tovey and Julian Rhind-Tutt are both good value.

    Report message2

  • Message 3

    , in reply to message 2.

    Posted by Rosemary (U7231409) on Friday, 13th February 2015

    What role did David Wenham play in Top of The Lake, goodhelenstar? I can't remember now ...

    Report message3

  • Message 4

    , in reply to message 3.

    Posted by goodhelenstar (U13943062) on Friday, 13th February 2015

    He was Robin's boss Al, the head of the local police - can't remember his rank but he was senior to her.

    Report message4

  • Message 5

    , in reply to message 4.

    Posted by Rosemary (U7231409) on Friday, 13th February 2015

    He was Robin's boss Al, the head of the local police - can't remember his rank but he was senior to her.Ìý Ah yes, thanks. I remember that character. Thank you!

    Report message5

  • Message 6

    , in reply to message 5.

    Posted by Geometry_Man (U12739007) on Friday, 20th February 2015

    I'm looking forward to this. A lot of familiar names in the cast.

    Episode 1 is now confirmed for Thursday 5 March, 9.00pm-10.00pm, Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú TWO.

    Report message6

  • Message 7

    , in reply to message 6.

    Posted by hollybeau (U13700692) on Friday, 20th February 2015

    Excellent, something else to look forward to.smiley - ok

    Report message7

  • Message 8

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by nick maroney (U14917587) on Sunday, 22nd February 2015

    I don't mind "issue " lead Drama as long as it doesn't turn into a long rant , I don't want to be bashed over the head and told what to think as his last Drama Common did and it put me off watching it . ( I read an interview in the Radio Times with him and and was pretty much a very long rant ) . I like Myanna Buring and as I am currently seeing( and enjoying )a lot more of Russell Tovey thanks to his role in looking , I could pretty much watch him read from a Dictionary. I will give Banished a whirl .

    Report message8

  • Message 9

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by nick maroney (U14917587) on Tuesday, 24th February 2015

    This starts on Thursday 05th of March [ March already !!!!!! ] at 9 pm on Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú 2 . According to the Radio Times it is not Gritty like other Jimmy Mcgoverns Dramas , it is more of a love Triangle between Russell , Myanna and Julian . I have seen a Trailer of this 7 part Drama and looks quite good.

    Report message9

  • Message 10

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by Annie-Lou est Charlie (U4502268) on Wednesday, 25th February 2015

    The blurb on the web page says it's based on "stark historical reality"....hmmmmm....well I guess we'll see. I'm not saying it won't be but I'm not holding my breath.
    I'm afraid I'm very much NOT a fan of Jimmy McGoven, I find him very self regarding and he has a tendency to shove lessons down the audience's throat.

    I only hope it is fair to Arthur Phillip, a remarkable man without whom the whole first and second fleets would probably have died.

    Report message10

  • Message 11

    , in reply to message 10.

    Posted by pandaeyes (U15971470) on Wednesday, 25th February 2015

    I read the article featured in next week's "Radio Times", looks interesting, think I'll give it a go.

    Report message11

  • Message 12

    , in reply to message 11.

    Posted by Guv-nor (U7476305) on Wednesday, 4th March 2015

    Cast & Characters


    Note here
    As relevant as what McGovern has chosen to include in his story is what he has opted to omit. The First Fleeters did have well-documented encounters with the aboriginal people, but none will appear in this series of Banished.

    "The British haven't met the aboriginal people in my drama. It is difficult to exaggerate how important is it to get the portrayal of indigenous Australians right.

    The time-frame in Banished is very short - something just over two weeks - and there is not sufficient time to develop and do justice to indigenous characters. Hopefully if there's another series there would be time to collaborate and get any representation right."

    Report message12

  • Message 13

    , in reply to message 12.

    Posted by Mobson (U14628682) on Thursday, 5th March 2015

    Great piece of advertising for the Australian Tourist Board or a bolster for Feminist's Rights?...

    Standing on a sandy beach overlooking the ocean waves crashing onto the shore....dialogue between Governor Phillip and his deputy Major Ross... Gov: "London will be sending more women in the meantime should we not share those we have"...Ross: Sir? Gov: "is it right for your soldiers to keep the women to themselves?...Ross: It is right Sir Yes..my men are all volunteers ...in a God forsaken corner of a God forsaken country across a God forsaken ocean - they barely eat, they barely drink, take away their women Sir and they will rebel! Major Ross departs whilst saluting!

    Report message13

  • Message 14

    , in reply to message 13.

    Posted by Guv-nor (U7476305) on Thursday, 5th March 2015

    Setting sail now.

    Report message14

  • Message 15

    , in reply to message 14.

    Posted by FowPah (U1746998) ** on Thursday, 5th March 2015

    Ooh strong stuff.

    Report message15

  • Message 16

    , in reply to message 14.

    Posted by The Man Who Watched Telly (U15436784) on Thursday, 5th March 2015

    Good so far, better than the usual 'oh Mr darcy' nonsense.

    Report message16

  • Message 17

    , in reply to message 16.

    Posted by zelda (U2012536) on Thursday, 5th March 2015

    Disgraceful programme. Glorifying criminal activity and giving people a free cruise to the other side of the world. It will only encourage bad behaviour. smiley - winkeye

    It's a bit dark innit?

    Report message17

  • Message 18

    , in reply to message 16.

    Posted by minnie3 (U7451737) on Thursday, 5th March 2015

    I've turned over, I can't bear it anymore.

    Report message18

  • Message 19

    , in reply to message 18.

    Posted by zelda (U2012536) on Thursday, 5th March 2015

    I've turned over, I can't bear it anymore.Ìý


    Why? Life was hard and difficult way back then.

    Report message19

  • Message 20

    , in reply to message 19.

    Posted by cakewalk (U11941928) ** on Thursday, 5th March 2015

    I've been gripped by this from the start, what, 50 minutes ago.

    Yes it's dark, and I'm sure Jimmy McGovern is using a bit of poetic licence but I have no doubt that for transportees at the time, life was very difficult.

    Report message20

  • Message 21

    , in reply to message 19.

    Posted by minnie3 (U7451737) on Thursday, 5th March 2015

    I know I love history but it is too depressing and too visual. After last week's Wolf Hall

    Report message21

  • Message 22

    , in reply to message 19.

    Posted by SATM67 (U14061947) ** on Thursday, 5th March 2015

    I've turned over, I can't bear it anymore.Ìý


    Why? Life was hard and difficult way back then.Ìý
    True, but were women convicts flogged?

    Report message22

  • Message 23

    , in reply to message 22.

    Posted by strictlyaddicted2dancing (U14110008) on Thursday, 5th March 2015

    I've turned over, I can't bear it anymore.Ìý


    Why? Life was hard and difficult way back then.Ìý
    True, but were women convicts flogged?Ìý
    according to Jimmy Mcgovern .. the floggings are fiction.

    Report message23

  • Message 24

    , in reply to message 23.

    Posted by TalkingHead (U16175014) ** on Thursday, 5th March 2015

    Just brilliant, more please.

    Report message24

  • Message 25

    , in reply to message 17.

    Posted by beatxt (U14042175) on Thursday, 5th March 2015

    First thoughts...
    Half the convicts sound like they've just come out of EastEnders. I'm surprised I haven't heard "You slaaag" yet.

    They could have made this in a studio - like Tenko (or It Aint 'alf Hot Mum) - and saved £millions.

    Prompts me to wonder why they never got round to making Carry on Convict.

    Report message25

  • Message 26

    , in reply to message 23.

    Posted by The Man Who Watched Telly (U15436784) on Thursday, 5th March 2015

    Brilliant edge of the seat stuff, best thing since peaky blinders. Suggest those of a sensitive nature watch Poldark which is made for the girls.

    Report message26

  • Message 27

    , in reply to message 22.

    Posted by susiesar (U10941938) on Thursday, 5th March 2015

    I think they were, convicts were treated appallingly women as well as men they were lucky if they didn't die on the ship.
    Jimmy McGovern doesn't hold back on the realism.

    Report message27

  • Message 28

    , in reply to message 26.

    Posted by Gill P (U15961217) on Thursday, 5th March 2015

    Brilliant edge of the seat stuff, best thing since peaky blinders. Suggest those of a sensitive nature watch Poldark which is made for the girls.Ìý I watched it - and I am a girl (plus a few more years). Poldark is not just for girls.

    MyAnna Buring was Long Susan in Ripper Street and Captain Collins was also in that programme, playing the reporter with a false ear!

    Report message28

  • Message 29

    , in reply to message 26.

    Posted by alan997 (U1233723) on Thursday, 5th March 2015

    Hate to say it, especially given its Jimmy McGovern credentials, but I was disappointed. There were some good one-liners, and the acting was fine, but there was just too much that didn't ring true, for me at least.

    People wandering around and having meaningful conversations in the middle of the night, eg, when surely convicts would simply not have had such freedoms - especially ones scheduled to hang. And the woman's miraculous recovery from her vicious beating. And the Minister's sudden conversion - what of his earlier conviction? Entirely overcome by the word 'crucifixion'? Really? Not to mention the central dilemma, not in the least addressed by the supposed 'resolution'. Are we to understand that convicts are now free to marry, so long as they are single, thereby presumably denying the wives to the troops? Where does that leave the 'my soldiers will rebel' problem?

    No, episode 1s are always tricky, and it wasn't bad enough to dissuade me from sticking with it for the moment. But based on what I've seen so far, the best I can muster is a 'Hmmmmm...'

    Report message29

  • Message 30

    , in reply to message 27.

    Posted by strictlyaddicted2dancing (U14110008) on Thursday, 5th March 2015

    I think they were, convicts were treated appallingly women as well as men they were lucky if they didn't die on the ship.
    Jimmy McGovern doesn't hold back on the realism.Ìý
    see msg 23 ... Jimmy Mcgovern has said he added quite a lot of fiction to this, for dramatic purposes, but of course the conditions were harsh ... probably much worse than depicted on the beatifiul coastline of Curl Curl.

    Report message30

  • Message 31

    , in reply to message 29.

    Posted by GaryB007 (U3895241) on Thursday, 5th March 2015

    They all had immaculate teeth. Not very realistic for convicts.

    Report message31

  • Message 32

    , in reply to message 31.

    Posted by strictlyaddicted2dancing (U14110008) on Thursday, 5th March 2015

    They all had immaculate teeth. Not very realistic for convicts.Ìý ... and didn't look malnourished either.

    Report message32

  • Message 33

    , in reply to message 25.

    Posted by deansay (U5811575) ** on Thursday, 5th March 2015

    They interviewed Myanna Buring, on Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú Breakfast this week and she said that the outside scenes are all Australia, but the inside scenes were shot in Manchester, so continuity was very important, because the preceding and successive scenes were shot months apart, so they had videos to show what went before or after.

    So I had to watch this this just to see how the editing/continuity fitted and personally I couldn't see any 'joins' at all!! smiley - winkeye

    Report message33

  • Message 34

    , in reply to message 32.

    Posted by counterblast (U14258320) on Thursday, 5th March 2015

    I feel like I've been bashed over the head by a rusty tin of Fosters.

    Stuck with it, though. The woman from Ripper Street obviously specialises in 'tarts with a heart'. Russell Tovey was good - despite his near perfect gnashers and generally well-rounded appearance.

    I was hoping the spider would kill the horrible Scotsman.

    Report message34

  • Message 35

    , in reply to message 34.

    Posted by deansay (U5811575) ** on Thursday, 5th March 2015

    I was hoping the spider would kill the horrible Scotsman.Ìý

    I was thinking that he might have had a bit of a nasty shock from the spider when he went to relieve himself smiley - spidersmiley - yikes

    Report message35

  • Message 36

    , in reply to message 35.

    Posted by Gill P (U15961217) on Thursday, 5th March 2015

    I think he will eventually get his come-uppance, hopefully from the spider.

    Report message36

  • Message 37

    , in reply to message 23.

    Posted by Dee (U3082905) on Friday, 6th March 2015

    I think female convicts were flogged. I wonder if the Elizabeth Quinn character was partially based on this woman who was flogged (25 lashes) for being where she shouldn't & eventually ended up marrying a soldier after living with another man (not sure if he was a convict).

    Report message37

  • Message 38

    , in reply to message 37.

    Posted by Geometry_Man (U12739007) on Friday, 6th March 2015

    On the whole I enjoyed it. However, there were quite a few elements which required suspension of disbelief - and the lever on the gallows platform had me thinking of Graham Norton's red chair I'm afraid!

    Worth sticking with, though.

    Report message38

  • Message 39

    , in reply to message 31.

    Posted by Primrose (U16092747) on Friday, 6th March 2015

    They all had immaculate teeth. Not very realistic for convicts.Ìý The Parson had terrible teeth! smiley - yikes

    Having read the not exactly glowing reports about this, I had expected to think that it was rubbish, but actually, I enjoyed it. However the loud music got in the way sometimes, so I have no idea what the Parson's wife shouted at him just as he was about to hang the convict. smiley - erm

    Could someone please tell me.

    Report message39

  • Message 40

    , in reply to message 39.

    Posted by alan997 (U1233723) on Friday, 6th March 2015

    <quote postid='121547482'><quote postid='121544344'> I have no idea what the Parson's wife shouted at him just as he was about to hang the convict. smiley - erm
    </quote>
    "This is a crucifixion!"

    Report message40

  • Message 41

    , in reply to message 40.

    Posted by Primrose (U16092747) on Friday, 6th March 2015

    I have no idea what the Parson's wife shouted at him just as he was about to hang the convict. smiley - erm
    Ìý

    "This is a crucifixion!"Ìý


    Thank you! smiley - hug Now I understand why he stopped. smiley - ok

    Report message41

  • Message 42

    , in reply to message 39.

    Posted by Alsdouble (U524298) on Friday, 6th March 2015

    It was worse than rubbish, it was like someone had commissioned a group amateurs who had never seen a good tv drama and had no idea how to go about it. (Yes, the young and inexperienced.) Possibly there will never be any good tv made, ever again.

    I would say everyone got paid, so yippee for them eh.

    Report message42

  • Message 43

    , in reply to message 34.

    Posted by markmyword49 (U1158309) on Friday, 6th March 2015

    I feel like I've been bashed over the head by a rusty tin of Fosters.

    Stuck with it, though. The woman from Ripper Street obviously specialises in 'tarts with a heart'. Russell Tovey was good - despite his near perfect gnashers and generally well-rounded appearance.

    I was hoping the spider would kill the horrible Scotsman.Ìý
    I thought Tovey was the weakest link in the acting stakes. Neither his appearance nor his acting made for a convincing character. He didn't look or sound like he was a character who would be picked on and bullied.

    There's been talk of continuity but to me the outside scenes looked tacked on with the inside scenes looking and sounding more like a stage play. I understand the writer is more interested in ideas than movement but it did look stilted at times.

    The programme overall was worth watching but it wouldn't be on my "must not miss" list.

    Report message43

  • Message 44

    , in reply to message 39.

    Posted by markmyword49 (U1158309) on Friday, 6th March 2015

    They all had immaculate teeth. Not very realistic for convicts.Ìý The Parson had terrible teeth! smiley - yikes

    Having read the not exactly glowing reports about this, I had expected to think that it was rubbish, but actually, I enjoyed it. However the loud music got in the way sometimes, so I have no idea what the Parson's wife shouted at him just as he was about to hang the convict. smiley - erm

    Could someone please tell me.Ìý
    Crucifixion If I remember rightly.

    Report message44

  • Message 45

    , in reply to message 44.

    Posted by Prophet Tenebrae (U5995226) on Friday, 6th March 2015

    Seems like a mixed reception...

    I'd considered checking it out but, honestly, McGovern's writing credit puts me off - if he's written a script that hasn't overtly shouted "smash the fascist middle class", I've not heard of it.

    Report message45

  • Message 46

    , in reply to message 45.

    Posted by DelusionsOfAdequacy (U15449583) ** on Friday, 6th March 2015

    This would be it.

    Report message46

  • Message 47

    , in reply to message 45.

    Posted by susiesar (U10941938) on Friday, 6th March 2015

    Seems like a mixed reception...

    I'd considered checking it out but, honestly, McGovern's writing credit puts me off - if he's written a script that hasn't overtly shouted "smash the fascist middle class", I've not heard of it.Ìý
    I don't think there was a "fascist middle class" to smash in 18th century Australia smiley - laugh

    Report message47

  • Message 48

    , in reply to message 38.

    Posted by goodhelenstar (U13943062) on Friday, 6th March 2015

    On the whole I enjoyed it. However, there were quite a few elements which required suspension of disbelief - and the lever on the gallows platform had me thinking of Graham Norton's red chair I'm afraid!

    Worth sticking with, though.Ìý
    Hmm. I haven't watched it yet - a slave to The Good Wife, despite the ads. I was a bit put off by reading that the writer invented the soldiers having 'first rights' to women, and also that there is no aboriginal presence at all. I've never understood the point of writing historical drama and making half of it up. Life was harsh enough there - even surviving the voyage was remarkable - without inventing aspects of life to satisfy the demands of time available.

    I've recorded it though so will watch; having abandoned The Casual Vacancy and Mr Selfridge without a backward glance, my PVR hard drive is looking a little sparse.

    Report message48

  • Message 49

    , in reply to message 47.

    Posted by Prophet Tenebrae (U5995226) on Friday, 6th March 2015

    Seems like a mixed reception...

    I'd considered checking it out but, honestly, McGovern's writing credit puts me off - if he's written a script that hasn't overtly shouted "smash the fascist middle class", I've not heard of it.Ìý
    I don't think there was a "fascist middle class" to smash in 18th century Australia smiley - laughÌý
    That's unlikely to prove an obstacle to Mr. McGovern.

    Report message49

  • Message 50

    , in reply to message 49.

    Posted by DelusionsOfAdequacy (U15449583) ** on Friday, 6th March 2015

    That's unlikely to prove an obstacle to Mr. McGovern.Ìý

    No sign of it so far - Governor written sympathetically, Chaplain and his wife ditto, and the bad lots were a convict bully and a private soldier.

    Perhaps you should watch it before deciding what the writer is guilty of.

    Report message50

Back to top

About this Board

The Points of View team invite you to discuss Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú Television programmes.

Add basic or to your posts.

Questions? Check the for answers first!

Go to: Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú News to discuss topics in the news

Make a complaint? Go to the website.

Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú News: Off-topic for this board, so contact them directly with your feedback:

or Ìýto take part in a discussion.



Mon-Sat: 0900-2300
Sun: 1000-2300

This messageboard is .

Find out more about this board's

Search this Board

Recent Discussions

Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú iD

Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú navigation

Copyright © 2015 Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú. The Â鶹¹ÙÍøÊ×Ò³Èë¿Ú is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.